Design playbook / LangGraph + LangSmith
Connect an agent graph to evidence that can be evaluated after change.
A proposed pathway from governance-relevant LangGraph topology and LangSmith evaluation evidence to Steerlane's dependency-aware assurance model.
Source → state → assurance → decision
A specific, explainable connection path.
This is a proposed integration contract illustrated with authored examples. Every state transition would require supported source access, provenance and product release qualification.
- 01
Identify agent topology
Map relevant nodes, tools, models and data flows without copying the development graph editor.
- 02
Bind evaluation evidence
Record run identity, dataset version, date and native evaluation provenance.
- 03
Observe proposed change
Associate an altered graph/tool/model with assurance claims the previous evidence supported.
- 04
Classify validity
Distinguish reusable evidence from items needing revalidation or human review.
Source inputs and provenance
Required for a bounded connector contract—not a promise that every native API exposes them.
- Selected topology and tool/model metadata
- Evaluation run ID, dataset version and timestamp
- Native source and bounded evaluation provenance
Questions the control layer must answer
Consequences of change, measured against the governing baseline and evidence.
- Does the prior evaluation cover this exact candidate state?
- Which downstream assurance dependencies are affected?
- Which result can be reused without repeating unaffected checks?
Boundaries and unknowns
No source coverage, no certainty.
Steerlane does not treat unavailable fields as verified unchanged. Unsupported authority, missing telemetry and stale sources remain explicitly unresolved.
- Tracing is not itself an assurance approval.
- Topology and evaluation availability depend on API and authorized scope.
- No LangSmith project, traces or evaluations are accessed by the marketing site.
Evaluation focus: topology, run provenance, datasets and evidence versioning.
Evaluate the actual scope before committing to a pilot.
Tell us your platform, tenant boundaries, evidence sources and review ownership. Pilot commitments remain limited to demonstrated capabilities.